Is Warner Music Group finally pulling it's head out?

Warner to back away from free streaming services?

Warner CEO rejects streaming without pay?

A label is starting to realize that devaluing music is bad for artists and labels?

Can it be true?

Well, sort of… They have only pulled their head half way out of their ass…Read more...

Publisher says Amazon pricing devalues books...

I think the recent pricing disagreements publishers are having with Amazon are very interesting. There seems to be lots of pushing by authors and publishers for a greater share of the profits from the ebook seller Amazon.

Good luck finding any musicians pushing for greater share of profits from download shops.

Also, have you ever heard of any musician or advocate ever speak of the perils of devaluing music? Never.

Why can’t we be more like the publishing world and stand up for the value of our hard work?

Anyway, here is the related article:Read more...

Music industry prepares for post-merger landscape

By Ray Waddell

NASHVILLE (Billboard) - After nearly a year of intense scrutiny, political posturing and consumer outcry, it’s time for the music business to come to grips with its new superpower: Live Nation Entertainment.

At a time when live entertainment remains one of the healthier sectors of the troubled music industry, the combined Live Nation and Ticketmaster stands to dominate each part of that sector: touring, management and ticketing.Read more...

WSJ: Apple wants e-books to be $12.99 or $14.99 for hardcover best sellers

Here’s a little price snippet on Apple’s e-book plans, care of an eleventh hour Wall Street Journal piece. According to the article, the gang in Cupertino is asking book publishers (HarperCollins was specifically cited) to set the price point for digital versions of hardcover bestsellers at either $12.99 or $14.00, “with fewer titles offered at $9.99.” The publisher apparently has the option to set its own price, but at any rate, Apple’s taking the usual 30% cut from each sale — a $14.99 novel would thus leave about $10.49 for the publisher. Full article

Ok, this is a great lesson for musicians. Notice how everyone acknowledges the value books have regardless of the medium they are distributed in? Have you ever heard anyone say that writers shouldn’t be paid for their books? Would Spotify CEO Daniel Ek be laughed out of business if he announced that he wanted to commercially exploit authors’ books and not pay them?Read more...

Wired magazine and other news...

Wired magazine’s Mr. Know-It-All answers a reader’s question (with our help) on iTunes and how much artists get paid per download. Apple takes 30% and label, distributer and artist fight for a split of the 70% left over. Wired article
I’ve assembled more detailed info on how the cash is divided and how to get your music on iTunes here.

In other news, I’d really like to feature an Artist of the Week/Month as I think spreading the word about the great independent bands out there just waiting to be discovered is inspiring for artists and exciting for music lovers.Read more...

Court revives lawsuit accusing labels of price fixing

Appeals court OKs suit vs major music studios

A Second Circuit Court of Appeals in New York today reinstated an antitrust lawsuit accusing EMI, Sony, Universal and Warner of illegal price fixing for digital music. Putting aside a dismissal from October 2008, Judge Robert Katzmann said there was enough evidence to “plausibly suggest” that the music labels might try to keep download prices artificially high through collusion.Read more...

RIAA's three-strikes rule a "scarecrow?"

RIAA knows ISP notices ineffective

The Recording Industry Association of America’s ISP piracy warning deals are nothing but a public relations front, industry sources claimed yesterday. While the music label group had initially suggested it would have a deal that would disconnect repeat offenders, the purported insiders say labels wanted a “scarecrow” that would spook pirates even though the threat of disconnection couldn’t legally be enforced. The aim, according to CNET, was primarily to replace the tactic of suing individual customers with an approach that still implied punishment.Read more...

Google guilty of copyright infringement

Jean-Paul SartreJean-Paul SartreA Paris court has found Google guilty of copyright infringement in a ruling which could have ramifications for its plans to digitise the world’s books.

Businesses like Google that base their products or business models on the wholesale stealing of works by thousands of creators are a far greater threat to our culture and economy than illegal downloading by individuals.

I’m sure as Google sets the standard for this new vile behavior numerous start up companies will follow…Read more...

MySpace screws artists... Again...

MySpace/Imeem Deal Leaves Thousands of Artists Unpaid. What else is new.

http://www.wired.com/epicenter/2009/12/myspace-imeem-deal/

When will artists grow a backbone and say enough is enough?

Here is a thought… Why don’t we unite to demand that MySpace and it’s giant corporate boss pay these artists what they are due?

Perhaps someone can put together a form letter that others can download and mail to MySpace etc etc?

Writer's digital rights deal with Amazon startles New York publishers.

Stephen CoveyStephen CoveyStephen Covey’s digital rights deal with Amazon startles New York publishers.

Paul Aiken, head of the Authors Guild, pointed out that most ebook deals award authors 25% of royalties, which, given the lower costs of publishing digitally, is only about a half of the accepted rate in print books.

“Up to now that hasn’t been much of an issue, because the ebook market was so tiny,” Aiken said. “Now that’s changing, and authors with clout are starting to demand more.”

So, if writers can unite and raise royalty rates for digital downloads why can’t songwriters?

Anyone?Read more...

Syndicate content